Submale’s Supreme Sacrifice
The ultimate sacrifice a male can make in being completely owned and dominated by his woman would have to be, “Castration”. I really would consider accepting this fate, for the right woman! According to the Freudian point of view, the male, upon discovering his mother has no penis, views this as an indication of superiority and desirability. I think, the removal of the testes while leaving the penis intact, serves to make, as completely as possible, a mockery of the male. He can not be a female, though he longs to, nor can he be a man any more. He is now some perversion of his own insane desires. (I would be most interested to know if sexual function [i.e. erection] is still possible in the castrated male. I can only assume that it must be. After learning of the Hale-Bopp Cult in California, I am inclined to suspect castration is not entirely rare.)
I think at this point it ceases to be just a physical or sexual matter. To be willing to go to this extreme, the male’s desire has evolved to become completely owned by the woman, body, mind and soul. True voluntary human slavery. It is also the desire to give, ingrained in the submale. Certainly the male could offer nothing of greater personal value. It is far more than just giving her his testes, it symbolizes giving everything that has made the male what he is up to that time. He offers her a true living sacrifice.
By Apollinaire (Details unknown)
Originally posted 2015-12-25 09:05:23.